Inovasi pengukuran disiplin belajar online: Alat penilaian kedisiplinan revolusioner untuk siswa sekolah dasar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) mengembangkan instrumen penilaian disiplin dalam pembelajaran online yang dapat digunakan guru dalam pembelajaran di sekolah dasar; dan 2) mengetahui validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penilaian disiplin dalam pembelajaran online sebagai pedoman penilaian kualitas siswa sekolah dasar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pengembangan instrumen. Pengumpulan data melalui angket penilaian diri siswa. Validasi tiga Expert Judgments alat pengumpul data dianalisis menggunakan formula Aiken'V, self assessment field test dianalisis menggunakan validitas konstruk Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), dan reliabilitas dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach. Hasil validasi Expert Judgment menunjukkan validitas ? 0,5; ini berarti semua item valid, dan reliabilitas antar penilai tidak menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan. Hasil KMO = 0,590 pada uji coba terbatas dan uji coba diperluas KMO = 0,838. Berdasarkan muatan faktor, 15 item memiliki nilai ? 0,3 sehingga semua item valid. Reliabilitas uji coba pertama sebesar 0,654 dan uji coba kedua sebesar 0,754. Berdasarkan hasil analisis EFA, instrumen yang dikembangkan memiliki reliabilitas yang tinggi dan lebih besar dari kriteria minimum = 0,6. Hasil rotasi varimax variabel telah didistribusikan ke masing-masing faktor. Faktor karakter disiplin terdiri dari 5 faktor. Produk akhir dari hasil penelitian adalah instrumen penilaian disiplin yang valid dan reliabel.

The development of discipline assessment instruments in the online learning process for elementary school students

Abstract: This study aims to 1) develop disciplinary assessment instruments in online learning that teachers can use in learning in elementary schools; and 2) know the validity and reliability of disciplinary assessment instruments in online learning as quality assessment guidelines for elementary school students. This study uses the instrument development method. Collecting data through a student self-assessment questionnaire. Three Expert Judgments validated the data collection tool analyzed using the Aiken'V formula, self-assessment field tests were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) construct validity, and reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's Alpha. The Expert Judgment validation results show a validity of ? 0.5; this means that all items are valid, and the inter-rater reliability shows no significant difference. The results of KMO = 0.590 in the limited trial and the expanded trial KMO = 0.838. Based on the factor loading, 15 items have a value of ? 0.3, so all items are valid. The reliability of the first trial was 0.654 and the second trial was 0.754. Based on the results of the EFA analysis, the developed instrument has high reliability and is greater than the minimum criterion = 0.6. The variables' Varimax rotation results have been distributed to each factor. Discipline character factors consist of 5 factors. The final product of the research results is a valid and reliable disciplinary assessment instrument.