Abstract:

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk:  1) Mengembangkan instrumen penilaian disiplin dalam pembelajaran daring agar selanjutnya dapat digunakan guru dalam pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. 2) Mengetahui validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penilaian disiplin dalam pembelajaran daring agar dapat digunakan sebagai pedoman penilaian yang berkualitas bagi siswa Sekolah Dasar. Penelitian menggunakan metode pengembangan instrumen. Pengumpulan data melalui angket penilaian diri siswa. Alat pengumpulan data divalidasi 3 Expert Judgment dianalisis menggunakan formula Aiken’V dan uji lapangan penilaian diri dianalisis menggunakan validitas konstruk Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), reliabilitas dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach. Hasil validasi Expert Judgment menunjukkan validitas ≥ 0,5 hal ini berarti bahwa seluruh item valid, reliabilitas antar-rater menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan. Hasil KMO = 0,590 pada uji coba terbatas dan pada uji coba diperluas KMO = 0,838. Berdasarkan muatan faktor terdapat 15 item yang memiliki nilai ≥ 0,3, maka keseluruhan item valid. Reliabilitas uji coba pertama 0,654 dan uji coba ke dua 0,754. Berdasarkan hasil analisis EFA instrumen yang dikembangkan memiliki reliabilitas yang tinggi dan lebih besar dibanding kriteria minimum = 0,6. Hasil rotasi varimax variabel-variabel sudah terditribusikan ke masing-masing faktor. Faktor-faktor karakter disiplin terdiri dari 5 faktor. Produk akhir hasil penelitian berupa instrumen penilaian disiplin yang valid dan reliabel.

Abstract: This study aims to: 1) Develop disciplinary assessment instruments in online learning so that further teachers can use it in learning in elementary schools. 2) Knowing the validity and reliability of discipline assessment instruments in online learning so that they can be used as quality assessment guidelines for elementary school students. This research uses instrument development method. Data collection through student self-assessment questionnaires. Data collection tools validated 3 Expert Judgment were analyzed using the Aiken'V formula and the self-assessment field test was analyzed using the construct validity of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the reliability was analyzed using Alpha Cronbach. Expert judgment validation results show validity ≥ 0.5, this means that all items are valid, inter-rater reliability shows no significant difference. The results of KMO = 0.590 in limited trials and in extended trials KMO = 0.838. Based on the factor load, there are 15 items that have a value of ≥ 0.3, so all items are valid. The reliability of the first trial was 0.654 and the second trial was 0.754. Based on the results of EFA analysis, the instrument developed has high reliability and is greater than the minimum criteria = 0.6. The results of the varimax rotation of the variables have been distributed to each factor. Discipline character factors consist of 5 factors. The final product of the research result is a valid and reliable discipline assessment instrument.