Endah Ratnaningsih (1)
This study aimed at describing: (1) the phasal and sub-phasal structures of the ECG; (2) the ECG processes; and (3) the implications of the ECG for the English language education at the junior high schools in Saptosari, Gunungkidul Regency. This was descriptive research. The data were collected through classroom observations and recording. Those were analyzed by using Gregory’s phasal analysis model. The results are as follows. (1) The CT(Consent), GS(Genre Structuring), SU(Substantiation), EV(Evaluation), and CO(Conclusion) phases occur in ECGs. The prominently occurring sub-phases in ECGs are GR(Greeting) and LT(Leave-taking) of the CT, OR(Orientation) and ME(Message) of the GS, IC(Interchange) and CH(Check) of the SU, JU(Judgement) of the EV, SM(Summary) and RM(Recommendation) of the CO. The prominently occurring sub-phases structure in the ECGs is ME(Message)^LT(Leave-taking) sequence for the CT(Consent) phase and CH(Check)^IC(Interchange) sequence for the SU(Substantiation) phase. (2) The ECG Processes occur in phases and have goals. (3) The implications appeared in the aspects of phase/structure of the lesson, goal, and language function.
Asp, E. D., & De Villiers, J. (2010). When language breaks down: Analysing discourse in clinical contexts. Cambridge University Press.
Briones, R. R. Y. (2012). Move analysis of philosophy research article introductions published in the University of Santo Tomas. Philippine ESL Journal, 9, 56–75.
Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&C Black.
Grabe, W. (2002). Narrative and expository macro-genres. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 249–267). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Gregory, M. (1988). Generic situation and register. In Linguistics in a systemic perspective (Vol. 39, p. 301). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.39.12gre
Gregory, M. (2002). Phasal analysis within communication linguistics: two contrastive discourses. In Relations and Functions within and around Language (pp. 316–345). Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2002). 6. Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000065
Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Martin, J. (2002). A universe of meaning-How many practices. In Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 269–278). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Sinar, T. S. (2002). Phasal and experiential realizations in lecture discourse: A systemic functional perspectives. University of Malaya.
Thornbury, S., & Slade, D. (2006). Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
Wu, S. (2013). Discourse structure and listening comprehension of English academic lectures. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1705.