(2) Imam Ghozali (Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia)
*corresponding author
AbstractThe objectives of this research are to: (1) describe patterns of teacher-students interaction of English Teaching Learning process in the Tenth Grade of SMK Negeri 1 Saptosari Gunungkidul, and (2) reveal the interactional features used by the teacher related to the pedagogic goals during teaching learning process. This research belongs to discourse analysis which aims at describing conversation and interaction of teacher-students during English teaching learning process in the tenth grade of SMK Negeri 1 Saptosari Gunungkidul. The data were collected through observation and backed up with reading and were analyzed using the theory of IRF exchange structure and the SETT Framework (Walsh, 2006). The result showed that there were 20 patterns of interaction of 21 exchange structures used in 7 types of transaction. The transactions were opening/greeting session, introduction, warm up/re-checking session, explaining session, instructioning session, practicing session, closing/note taking session. Some interactional features used by the teacher were found in the classroom interaction. There were 10 types of interactional features were used by the teacher with the total number 115. The using of display question 47, confirmation checks 17, predominant of IRF was 12, use of scaffolding 11, form focused feedback 9, clarification request 7, teacher turn by giving instructions 4, teacher turn by giving explanations 3, corrective repair 3, use of transactional marker 2. It revealed that the use of display questions was the most commonly used by the teacher in this classroom interaction. From the classroom interaction, it can be concluded that the teacher tended to pose display questions which prevented the students to express their elaborate ideas. The teacher also gave few scaffolding in her teaching and it hindered the students’ fluency. However, it might be effective for vocabulary learning through the exercise discussion. KeywordsDiscourse; IRF exchange structure; interactional features; SETT Frameworks
|
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.33292/jalintrali.v1i1.53 |
Article metrics10.33292/jalintrali.v1i1.53 Abstract views : 786 | PDF views : 348 |
Cite |
Full TextDownload |
References
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy.2nd Edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Buxton, B. (1989). The “Natural†language of interaction: A perspective on non-verbal dialogues. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 27(2), 221-229.
Cho, G. (2000). The role of heritage language in social interactions and relationships: Reflections from a language minority group. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(4), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2000.10162773
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge
Walsh, S. (2006). Exploring classroom discourse language in action. London: Routledge
Walsh, S. (2006). “Talking the Talk of the TESOL, Classroom. “ETL. Journal
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Applied Linguistics, Translation, and Literature
Journal of Applied Linguistics, Translation, and Literature is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://ejournal.ressi.id/index.php/JalinTraLi.