Login

An evaluation of Muhadatsah Program at Pondok Modern Daarul Abror using CIPP Model

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020):

Fitriyani Fitriyani (1), Rr. Hasti Robiasih (2)

(1) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

This research aimed to describe the evaluation of Muhadatsah Program in English teaching and learning process in Pondok Modern Daarul Abror in terms of the context, input, process, and product aspects. This research is an evaluation research employing CIPP model by Stufflebeam (2007). The data were collected through observation, interview, document analysis, and audio-visual materials. The data were analyzed using Miles and Humberman (1994)’s flow model of qualitative data research which included data reduction, data display, and conclusion and verification. In the term of product evaluation showed that MP can improve their vocabulary. It helped them in learning English in the classroom especially in writing and reading, they could speak English fluently and bravely, they knew how to pronounce the word correctly and the intonation of the sentence. It can make them speak up bravely.  However, it still needs improvement because the students who join MP just follow the rule but they didn’t realize the important of language for them.

References

Arifin, Z (2012). Penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ary. D., & Jacobs. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Method Approaches. Singapore: SAGE Publication. Fourth edition.

Effendi, A. F. (2005). Metodologi pengajaran bahasa Arab. Malang: Misykat.

Hermawan, A. (2013). Meteodologi pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Cet. III.

Issac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1989). Handbook in research and evaluation: for education and behavioral sciences. California: Edits publisher. Second edition.

Karataş, H. (2009). Evaluation of English curriculum at yıldız technical university using CIPP Model. 34, (153). 47-60. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4be0/ecd5e277a0712c459eae359d15a103792894.pdf

Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step Guide for Beginners. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Miles, M. B & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Muna, W. (2011). Metodologi pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Richards, J. C. (1995). The language teaching matrix. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rossi, P. H, Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. California: Sage Publications, Inc.)

Stufflebeam, D. L, George, F. M., & Thomas, K. (2002). Evaluation model. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Tekin, M. (2015). Evaluation of a preparatory school program at a public university in Turkey. 8 (36). 718-733. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt8/sayi36_pdf/6egitim/tekin_mustafa.pdf

Weiss. C. H. (1972). Evaluation research: methods for assessing program effectiveness. London: Prentice-Hall, inc.

Wholey, J. S, Hatry, H. P., & Newcomer, K. E. (2010). Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Third Edition.