Pengaruh segregasi gender terhadap hasil belajar matematika dan bahasa Inggris
(1) * Umi Farisiyah Mail (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
(2) Heri Retnawati Mail (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
(3) Aminuddin Hassan Mail (University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia)
(4) Nur Hidayanto Pancoro Setyo Putro Mail (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
(5) Erwin Syahril Mubarok Mail (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Al Hikmah Benda, Brebes, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


Salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi hasil belajar adalah pengorgansisasian kelas. Di Indonesia, pembagian ruang kelas sejenis dan campuran banyak dilakukan oleh sekolah-sekolah swasta. Studi ini menyelidiki pengaruh kelas sejenis dan campuran terhadap hasil belajar Matematika dan Bahasa Inggris siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan desain komparasi kausal. Tiga kelas yang terdiri dari 89 siswa (kelas sejenis laki-laki, kelas sejenis perempuan dan kelas campuran) dari sekolah menengah swasta di Indonesia menjadi sampel dengan menggunakn pendekatan convenience sampling. Instrumen tes dikembangkan oleh masing-masing guru mata pelajaran yang terdiri dari 30 soal Matematika dan 50 soal Bahasa Inggris melalui Computer Based Test. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengorganisasian kelas sejenis dalam proses pembelajaran Matematika dan bahasa Inggris berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap prestasi belajar Matematika dan Bahasa Inggris. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa pemisahan gender di dalam ruang kelas, kela sejenis dan campuran berpengaruh terhadap hasil belajar Matematika. Sedangkan untuk bahasa Inggris tidak ditemukan kecenderungan tersebut. 

 

The effect of gender segregation on Mathematics and English learning outcomes

 

Abstract: One of the factors that influence learning outcomes is class organization. In Indonesia, private schools mainly carry out the division of similar and mixed classrooms. This study investigates the effect of single-sex and coeducational classes on high school students mathematics and English learning outcomes. This research is a quantitative study using a causal-comparative design. Three classes consisting of 89 students (single male class, single female class, and coeducational class) from private secondary schools in Indonesia were sampled using a convenience sampling approach. Each subject teacher developed a test instrument consisting of 30 Mathematics questions and 50 English questions through a Computer Based Test. This study shows that organizing similar classes in learning Mathematics and English positively and significantly affects achievement in learning Mathematics and English. The study's results revealed that gender segregation in the classroom, same-class, and mixed classes affected mathematics learning outcomes. As for English, there was no such tendency. 


Keywords


Kelas Sejenis; Kelas Campuran; Segregasi gender; Studi komparasi kausal; Single-Sex Class; Coeducational Class; Gender Segregation; Causal Comparative Study

   

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.33292/meter.v2i2.190 		      

Article metrics

10.33292/meter.v2i2.190 Abstract views : 384 | PDF views : 143

   

Cite

How to cite item
   

Full Text

Download

References


Aslan, O. (2009). Peran gender dan strategi pembelajaran bahasa dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris. Universitas Teknik Timur Tengah.

Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.

Bandura, A., & Bussey, K. (2004). On broadening the cognitive, motivational, and sociostructural scope of theorizing about gender development and functioning: comment on martin, Ruble, and Szkrybalo (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.691

Best, S., Pearson, P. J., & Webb, P. I. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the effects of single-sex and coeducational classroom settings on the participation and performance of students in practical physical education [University of Wollongong]. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/360/

Blake, C. D. (2012). Single-sex education versus coeducation in north Georgia public middle schools. Liberty University.

Bradley, K. (2009). The impact of single-sex education on the performance of first and second grade public school students. Georgia Educational Researcher, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2009.070105

Brophy, J. (1985). Interactions of male and female students with male and female teachers. Gender Influences in Classroom Interaction, 115–142.

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson.

Douglas, D. D. (2011). Single gender versus coed instruction as a factor impacting reading achievement for male elementary school students. Walden University.

Farisiyah, U., & Zamzani, Z. (2018). Languange shift and language maintenance of local languages toward Indonesian. Proceedings of the International Conference of Communication Science Research (ICCSR 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/iccsr-18.2018.50

Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.2.95

Fennema, E. (1979). Women and girls in mathematics—equity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(4), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417086

Fennema, E., & Peterson, P. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics. In Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 17–35). Elsevier.

Gurian, M. (2010). Boys and girls learn differently! A guide for teachers and parents. John Wiley & Sons.

Kaefahmi, A., Supriyadi, S., & Wahyudin, A. (2019). Development of instrument for academic supervision the school superintendents -based CIPPO. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v8i1.29543

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 3(7), 19–39.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.

Laster, C. (2004). Why we must try same-sex instruction. The Education Digest, 70(1), 59.

Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: from theory to practice. Jossey-Bass.

MacNeilage, P. F., Rogers, L. J., & Vallortigara, G. (2009). Origins of the left & right brain. Scientific American, 301(1), 60–67. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evolutionary-origins-of-your-right-and-left-brain/

Mathers Jr, C. A. (2008). The role of single-sex and coeducational instruction on boys’ attitudes and self-perceptions of competence in French language communicative activities. Boston College.

O’Neill, F. (2011). From language classroom to clinical context: The role of language and culture in communication for nurses using English as a second language. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(9), 1120–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.008

Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1042–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035740

Parker, G. T., Droste, R. L., & Rennie, C. D. (2010). Stochastic calibration of riverine water quality models. Water Environment Research, 82(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143009X442934

Patterson, L. M., Carrillo, P. B., & Salinas, R. S. (2012). Lessons from a global learning virtual classroom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311398665

Piaget, J. (2003). Part I: Cognitive development in children--Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40.

Santrock, J. W. (2010). Adolescence: An introduction. Brown & Benchmark.

Sax, L. (2017). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. Harmony.

Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209508406961

Shi, Y., Peng, C., Yang, H. H., & MacLeod, J. (2018). Examining interactive whiteboard-based instruction on the academic self-efficacy, academic press and achievement of college students. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(2), 115–130.

Steinberg, L. (2002). Clinical adolescent psychology: What it is, and what it needs to be. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(1), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.124

Whitlock, J. L. (2006). Youth perceptions of life at school: contextual correlates of school connectedness in adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 10(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads1001_2

Wilson, K. L., & Boldizar, J. P. (1990). Gender segregation in higher education: Effects of aspirations, mathematics achievement, and income. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112897

Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (2002). Single-sex teaching in a co-educational comprehensive school in England: An evaluation based upon students’ performance and classroom interactions. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920220137449


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Measurement In Educational Research (Meter)



Measurement in Educational Research is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

Meter Stats