Abstract:
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kelayakan instrumen penilaian artikel ilmiah yang telah dikembangkan oleh peneliti. Instrument penilaian artikel ilmiah ini dikembangkan berdasarkan literatur dengan indikator organsasi artikel, format penulisan, komponen penting artikel, dan grammatical structure. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Butir dianalisis menggunakan perhitungan formula Aiken’s V. Data validitas isi diperoleh dari sebelas ahli dari berbagai bidang ilmu yang berpengalaman dalam penulisan artikel ilmiah. Hasil validasi ahli ditemukan dari 56 butir yang dibuat dinyatakan valid dengan indeks Aikens V > 0,75, dengan rincian 5 butir memiliki koefisien validitas sedang, dan 51 butir memiliki koefisien yang tinggi. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa semua butir instrumen memiliki validitas isi yang baik dan layak digunakan.
Â
Alhamdulillah, the points of developing scientific journal article assessment instruments are said to be valid by raters
Â
Abstract: This study aims to determine the feasibility of the scientific article assessment instrument that has been developed by the researcher. This scientific article assessment instrument was developed based on the literature with indicators of article organization, writing format, important components of the article, and grammatical structure. This study uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive method. The items were analyzed using Aiken's V formula calculations. Content validity data were obtained from eleven experts from various fields of science who are experienced in writing scientific articles. The results of expert validation were found that 56 items made were declared valid with an Aikens V index > 0.75, with details of 5 items having a moderate validity coefficient, and 51 items having a high coefficient. This indicates that all items of the instrument have good content validity and are suitable for use.
ÂReferences
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press, Inc.
Azer, S. A., Ramani, S., & Peterson, R. (2012). Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals. Medical Teacher, 34(9), 698–704. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.687488
Bashooir, K., & Supahar, S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19590
Clabough, E. B. D., & Clabough, S. W. (2016). Using rubrics as a scientific writing instructional method in early stage undergraduate neuroscience study. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education : JUNE : A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 15(1), A85–A93.
Cor, M. K. (2016). Trust me, it is valid: Research validity in pharmacy education research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.02.014
Cuschieri, S., Grech, V., & Savona-Ventura, C. (2019). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Structuring a scientific paper. Early Human Development, 128, 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.09.011
Ecarnot, F., Seronde, M.-F., Chopard, R., Schiele, F., & Meneveau, N. (2015). Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners. European Geriatric Medicine, 6(6), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2015.08.005
Hong, S.-T. (2014). Ten tips for authors of scientific articles. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 29(8), 1035. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.8.1035
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research. Wadsworth Publishing.
Kumaidi, K. (2014). Validitas dan pemvalidasian instrumen penilaian karakter. Seminar Psikometri Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Kurniawati, K. (2021). Analisis validitas isi instrumen tes berpikir kritis IPS kelas V SD Kota Yogyakarta. Pelita: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 21(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.33592/pelita.v21i1.1396
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Martuza, V. R. (1977). Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education. Allyn & Bacon.
Memon, A. R. (2020). Similarity and plagiarism in scholarly journal submissions: Bringing clarity to the concept for authors, reviewers and editors. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 35(27). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e217
Miswan, M. (2002). Jurnal elektronik sebagai sarana komunikasi ilmiah. AL-MAKTABAH, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/almaktabah.v4i1.1643
Muzaffar, A. (2016). Validitas tes dan kualitas butir soal. لسـانـنـا (LISANUNA): Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab Dan Pembelajarannya, 5(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.22373/l.v5i1.859
Nunnaly, J. C. (1981). Psychometric theory. Tata Mcgraw Hill Publishing Company Limited.
Pai, D., Chua, S. K., & Sood, S. (2017). Figures, tables and supporting material. In Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper (pp. 95–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_10
Pandawa, R. M., & Ridwan, A. (2021). Analysis of the instrument content validity using the aiken index on disaster nursing competency assessment. DEGRES, 20(1), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1877/degres.v20i1.90
Peh, W. C. G., & Arokiasamy, J. (2008). Plagiarism: a joint statement from the Singapore Medical Journal and the Medical Journal of Malaysia. Singapore Medical Journal, 49(12), 965. http://www.smj.org.sg/sites/default/files/4912/4912e1.pdf
Prem, S. S. (2017). Title. In Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper (p. 17). Springer.
Ramesh, R., & Ananthakrishnan, N. (2017). Results. In Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper (pp. 61–74). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_7
Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir. Parama Publishing.
Rusijono, R., Jaedun, A., Kartowagiran, B., Ahman, A., Laliyo, L. A. R., & Mam, S. (2020). Developing the teacher’s social competency assessment instrument in the fourth industrial revolution era. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i2.29482
Sauaia, A., Moore, E. E., Crebs, J. L., Maier, R. V., Hoyt, D. B., & Shackford, S. R. (2014). The anatomy of an article. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 76(5), 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000210
Sugiharni, G. A. D., & Setiasih, N. W. (2018). Validasi butir instrumen evaluasi model Alkin menggunakan formula Aiken. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika,(September).
Supriyadi, S. (2017). Developing scientific writing instruction evaluation instrument by using a constructivism approach. Proceedings of the 1st Yogyakarta International Conference on Educational Management/Administration and Pedagogy (YICEMAP 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/yicemap-17.2017.13
Swaan, P. W. (2010). Publication ethics—A guide for submitting manuscripts to Pharmaceutical Research. Pharmaceutical Research, 27(9), 1757–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0188-5
Turbek, S. P., Chock, T. M., Donahue, K., Havrilla, C. A., Oliverio, A. M., Polutchko, S. K., Shoemaker, L. G., & Vimercati, L. (2016). Scientific writing made easy: A step-by-step guide to undergraduate writing in the biological sciences. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 97(4), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1258