Rating Scale Model: Self-evaluation mahasiswa melalui pembelajaran online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33292/meter.v3i2.242Keywords:
Self-evaluation, Rating Scale Model, Pembelajaran OnlineAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur self-evaluation mahasiswa pendidikan matematika terhadap materi perkuliahan analsis real melalui pembelajaran online. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan pengambilan sampel berdasarkan pertimbangan tertentu (purposive sampling) yaitu mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Pattimura yang mengikuti mata kuliah analisis real sebanyak 106 responden. Data diperoleh dengan menyebarkan angket self evaluation melalui google form dan berupa angket respon dengan metode skala Likert. Analisis awal dilakukan untuk mengetahui validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen melalui perhitungan Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) untuk mengetahui validitas konstruk instrumen dan Cronbach’s Alpha untuk mengetahui reliabilitas. Selanjutnya dilakukan analisis Item Response Teory (IRT) politomus Rating Scale Model (RSM) untuk mengukur self-evaluation mahasiswa. Hasil analisis EFA menggunakan program R menghasilkan 7 faktor laten dari 30 item indikator dengan nilai Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) adalah 0. 79 dan MSA tiap item menunjukkan hasil > 0.5, loading faktor tiap item > 0.3 dan estimasi reliabilitas 0.877. Hasil perhitungan IRT politomus RSM menunjukkan model fit untuk setiap item dan diperoleh hasil IIF = 94.99%, TIF = 94.89%. Kategori respon mahasiswa untuk self evaluation terhadap materi perkuliahan analisis real melalui pembelajaran online dengan θ = -1.55 sampai 1.89 yaitu kategori mudah, sedang dan sulit. Berdasarkan hasil analisis maka instrumen dapat digunakan untuk mengukur self evaluation. Penelitian ini berkonstribusi terhadap implementasi praktek penskalaan pada instrumen penelitian pengukuran data kuantitatif.
Â
Rating Scale Model: Student self-evaluation through online learning
Â
Abstract: This study aims to measure the self-evaluation of mathematics education students on real analysis lecture material through online learning. This research uses a quantitative approach with sampling based on certain considerations (purposive sampling), namely student of Mathematics Education Study Program, FKIP Pattimura University who take real analysis courses as many as 106 respondents. Data was obtained by distributing self-evaluation questionnaires through google form and in the form of a response questionnaire with the Likert scale method. Initial analysis was carried out to determine the validity and reliability of the instrument through the calculation of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to determine the construct validity of the instrument and Cronbach's Alpha to determine reliability. Furthermore, Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis of the polytomus Rating Scale Model (RSM) was carried out to measure student self-evaluation. The results of the EFA analysis using the R program resulted in 7 latent factors from 30 indicator items with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0. 79 and MSA for each item showing results > 0.5, factor loading for each item > 0.3 and a reliability estimate of 0.877. The results of the RSM polynomial IRT calculation show a fit model for each item and the results obtained IIF = 94.99%, TIF = 94.89%. Student response categories for self-evaluation of real analysis lecture material through online learning with θ = -1.55 to 1.89 are easy, moderate and difficult categories. Based on the results of the analysis, the instrument can be used to measure self-evaluation. The research contributes to implementation of scaling practices in quantitative data measurement research instruments.
ÂReferences
Arifin, Z. (2009). Membangun kopetensi pedagogis guru matematika (landasan filosofi, histori, dan psikologi). Lentera Cendikia.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed). Erlbaum.
Guilford, J. (1956). Fundamental statistic in psychology and education. (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory. principles and aplications (G. F. & S. D. L. Madaus, Ed.). MA: Kluwer Inc.
Ismail, R., Rahmaningtyas, N. A., & Hadi, S. (2022). IRT unidimensi penskoran politomi. In S. & R. H. Hadi (Ed.), Analisis instrumen penelitian dengan teori tes klasik dan modern menggunakan program R (pp. 142–176). UNY Press.
Istiyono, E. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian dan analisis hasil belajar fisika. dengan teori tes klasik dan modern. UNY Press.
Kurniawan Afik. (2014). Evaluasi oleh diri sendiri (self evaluation) dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah studio perancang arsitektur. UPI.
Kurniawati, I., & Azis, D. K. (2022). Prestasi belajar siswa ditinjau dari aspek afektif. Measurement In Educational Research (Meter), 2(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.33292/meter.v2i2.188
Kusmaryono, I. (2014). The importance of mathematical power in mathematics learning. In International Conference on Mathematics.
Kusmaryono, I., Suyitno, H., Dwijanto, D., & Dwidayati, N. (2018). Developing assessment instrument as a mathematical power measurement. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(3), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i3.7343
Kusumaningrum, B., & Wijayanto, Z. (2020). Apakah pembelajaran matematika secara daring efektif? (Studi kasus pada pembelajaran selama masa pandemi Covid-19). Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i2.25029
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2017). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
Mogonea, F., & Mogonea, F.-R. (2013). Practical and applied aspects regarding the development of the Self-evaluation ability of students-future teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 531–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.159
Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic analysis of structural equantion modeling. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
Mulyasa, E. (2011). Menjadi pendidik profesional. menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Prihono, E. W. & R. H. (2022). Analisis faktor eksploratori. In S. & R. H. Hadi (Ed.), Analisis Instrumen Penelitian dengan Teori Tes Klasik dan Modern menggunakan Program R (pp. 47–62). UNY Press.
Purwono, Y., & Supriyoko, S. (2022). Prestasi belajar ditinjau dari aspek afektif: Sebuah analisis hipotetik regresi dan korelasi ganda. Measurement In Educational Research (Meter), 2(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.33292/meter.v2i1.186
Putra, E. A., Sudiana, R., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2020). Pengembangan smartphone learning management system (S-LMS) sebagai media pembelajaran matematika di SMA. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i1.21014
Ramaligela, S. M. (2014). Assessing fourth year student-teachers’ understanding of self-evaluation report writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3838–3842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.851
Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas & karakteristik butir. Parama Publishing.
Revelle, W. & R. M. W. (2022). Pasckage “psych.†In The Comprehensive R Archieve Network (pp. 337–338).
Suryabrata Sumadi. (2016). Psikologi kepribadian (Cetakan ke-23). PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Watson, J. C. (2017). Establishing evidence for internal structure using exploratory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336931
Widodo, A., & Nursaptini, N. (2020). Problematika pembelajaran daring dalam perspektif mahasiswa. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.30651/else.v4i2.5340
